Numerical Sensitivity and Efficiency in the Treatment of Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainty
نویسندگان
چکیده
Nowadays, the need to treat both epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in a unified framework is well recognized [1]. One method to do so is to mix probabilistic convolution (for aleatory uncertainty) and fuzzy calculus (for epistemic uncertainty). Existing propositions either concern simple models [2] or are computationally very costly [3] (a luxury not always affordable, especially in nuclear safety, where models can be very complex). Here, we propose a numerical treatment of such methods, based on Monte-Carlo sampling technique, which greatly reduces the computational costs and can be applied to complex models. Moreover, using well-known results from order statistics [4], we propose to integrate the notion of numerical accuracy to our results. Our proposition mainly consists in setting some decision step before the propagation is done, rather than after it has been done. Section 2 recalls theoretical basis of the propagation technique used here and discusses previous practical solutions proposed to put this method in practice. Section 3 explains our propagating method (called the RAndom FUzzy method, or RaFu) and how it is applied. The RaFu method, implemented in SUNSET software for uncertainty analysis, is currently used and developed at IRSN
منابع مشابه
Robustness-based portfolio optimization under epistemic uncertainty
In this paper, we propose formulations and algorithms for robust portfolio optimization under both aleatory uncertainty (i.e., natural variability) and epistemic uncertainty (i.e., imprecise probabilistic information) arising from interval data. Epistemic uncertainty is represented using two approaches: (1) moment bounding approach and (2) likelihood-based approach. This paper first proposes a ...
متن کاملNumerical approach for quantification of epistemic uncertainty
In the field of uncertainty quantification, uncertainty in the governing equations may assume two forms: aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty. Aleatory uncertainty can be characterised by known probability distributions whilst epistemic uncertainty arises from a lack of knowledge of probabilistic information. While extensive research efforts have been devoted to the numerical treatmen...
متن کاملNumerical accuracy and efficiency in the propagation of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
The need to differentiate between epistemic and aleatory uncertainty is now well admitted by the risk analysis community. One way to do so is to model aleatory uncertainty by classical probability distributions and epistemic uncertainty by means of possibility distributions, and then propagate them by their respective calculus. The result of this propagation is a random fuzzy variable. When dea...
متن کاملA Mixed Uncertainty Quantification Approach Using Evidence Theory and Stochastic Expansions
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is the process of quantitative characterization and propagation of input uncertainties to the response measure of interest in experimental and computational models. The input uncertainties in computational models can be either aleatory, i.e., irreducible inherent variations, or epistemic, i.e., reducible variability which arises from lack of knowledge. Previously...
متن کاملIntegration of Possibility-Based Optimization to Robust Design for Epistemic Uncertainty
1. Abstract In practical engineering applications, there exist two different types of uncertainties: aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. Aleatory uncertainty is classified as objective and irreducible uncertainty with sufficient information on input uncertainty data, whereas epistemic uncertainty is a subjective and reducible uncertainty that stems from lack of knowledge on input uncertainty ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/0712.2141 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007